![competitors of universal bus system competitors of universal bus system](https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/bus-taxi-area-citywalk-universal-studios-orlando-florida-april-146099816.jpg)
* A publicly funded plan means pressure to reduce taxes may lead to under-funding over time. * Special interest pressures often lead to bad policies in government programs. * Government can be inefficient, irrational, and inflexible (“administration by acts of Congress,” as with U.S. * Accountability in government is theoretically to the people, although this can often be sabotaged by special interests. * Universal health care can remove health care expenses from medical malpractice, worker’s compensation, and automobile insurance, drastically reducing their costs. A universal risk pool would relieve their fiscal problems.
![competitors of universal bus system competitors of universal bus system](https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/Hbe8219d9a8e241cb800e47f352114a68p/2020-New-GVS-KNX-EIB-K-bus-Smart-Home-Building-Automation-System-Dry-Contact-KNX-4.jpg)
* Public programs (Medicaid and Medicare) would no longer be dumping grounds for the sickest, most expensive populations. * Quality improvement programs work much better in a unified market. * Streamlined administration is much easier and less expensive for providers.
#Competitors of universal bus system professional
* Lower total health care costs means less pressure to restrict and control physicians’ professional decisions. per-capita total health care spending, and they cover everyone. Countries with universal health care spend about half of U.S. * Universal health care is less expensive because it has much lower administrative costs and allows effective cost controls. * Health care is independent of employment status.
#Competitors of universal bus system free
* Patients have free choice of providers. * Benefits are comprehensive, with minimal or no co-pays. Single-payer financing is most cost-efficient. However, in general, countries using multiple plans have higher health care costs. In these systems government requires universal and open enrollment, standardized benefits and fees, and risk-adjusted funding of plans. It uses a “social insurance” model in which everyone is included in a single risk-pool, with no exclusions from coverage based on health status, and it eliminates competing private health insurance plans.Įffective government-sponsored programs may use private plans provided they are made to function as a single risk-pool, as in many European countries. This is not the same as “socialized medicine,” in which government owns the hospitals and employs the physicians. It proposes public financing of universal health care, but leaves care delivery (doctors and hospitals) private and independent. Consider H.R.676, the House single-payer bill kept “off the table” during health reform negotiations.